THE CIA IS USING A EUROPEAN NATO ALLY’S SPY SERVICE TO CONDUCT A COVERT SABOTAGE CAMPAIGN INSIDE RUSSIA UNDER THE AGENCY’S DIRECTION, ACCORDING TO FORMER U.S. INTELLIGENCE AND MILITARY OFFICIALS.
interesanti + beigās komentāri par to, ka zolīdi izdevumi atteicās (tika palūgti) publicēt materiālu.
THE CIA IS USING A EUROPEAN NATO ALLY’S SPY SERVICE TO CONDUCT A COVERT SABOTAGE CAMPAIGN INSIDE RUSSIA UNDER THE AGENCY’S DIRECTION, ACCORDING TO FORMER U.S. INTELLIGENCE AND MILITARY OFFICIALS.
interesanti + beigās komentāri par to, ka zolīdi izdevumi atteicās (tika palūgti) publicēt materiālu.
Vēlos ziedot ukrainas armijai ieroču, munīcijas iegādei. Vienīgais ko googl piedāvā ir ieraks Aizsardz. ministrijas mājaslapā : Ukrainas Nacionālā banka atvērusi kontu Ukrainas bruņoto spēku atbalstam, lai saņemtu pārvedumus no starptautiskajiem partneriem un donoriem - UA843000010000000047330992708.
Vēl piedāvā ziedot.lv, sos ukrainas armijai, bet nav pārliecības, ka ziedojums aizies munīcijas, ieroču utml. iegādei.
Kādi Jūsu ieteikumi?
[ Šo ziņu laboja Norcha324, 29 Dec 2022, 15:58:30 ]
29 Dec 2022, 15:57:01 @Norcha324 rakstīja:
Vēlos ziedot ukrainas armijai ieroču, munīcijas iegādei. Vienīgais ko googl piedāvā ir ieraks Aizsardz. ministrijas mājaslapā : Ukrainas Nacionālā banka atvērusi kontu Ukrainas bruņoto spēku atbalstam, lai saņemtu pārvedumus no starptautiskajiem partneriem un donoriem - UA843000010000000047330992708.
Vēl piedāvā ziedot.lv, sos ukrainas armijai, bet nav pārliecības, ka ziedojums aizies munīcijas, ieroču utml. iegādei.
Kādi Jūsu ieteikumi?
Cik zinu ziedot elvē patur sev procentu..
Uz ātro atradu https://u24.gov.ua/
29 Dec 2022, 15:57:01 @Norcha324 rakstīja:
Vēlos ziedot ukrainas armijai ieroču, munīcijas iegādei. Vienīgais ko googl piedāvā ir ieraks Aizsardz. ministrijas mājaslapā : Ukrainas Nacionālā banka atvērusi kontu Ukrainas bruņoto spēku atbalstam, lai saņemtu pārvedumus no starptautiskajiem partneriem un donoriem - UA843000010000000047330992708.
Vēl piedāvā ziedot.lv, sos ukrainas armijai, bet nav pārliecības, ka ziedojums aizies munīcijas, ieroču utml. iegādei.
Kādi Jūsu ieteikumi?
Skaitu pa tiešo Ukrainas armijas kontā Ukrainas Bankā. Vai šim projektam https://www.projectsirin.com/ (ASV veterāni ar sakariem iepirkumos&logistics) Quad panoramic nods dabū <20k
Caur ziedot.lv un citiem LV partneriem militārie ziedojumi ir lielākā daļa fufelis, kur ne sūtītājs, ne saņēmējs īsti nesaprot kas ir best for the buck un nepieciešams. Par LV bruņu plākšņu ražotājiem nemaz nesāksim runāt, cerams otrā galā tiks tikai tiem neaptēstajiem no teritoriālās, kuriem nekad nebūs tās reāli vajadzīgas, vai pie zinošiem, kas sametinās uz auto, nevis liks carieros...
It is no secret that Ukraine needs defensive NATO-standard armored vehicles. Speaking at the Pentagon in mid-September 2022, a forward-thinking “senior military official” noted that Ukraine “may need to transition to NATO compatible” armored vehicles, and that “tanks are absolutely on the table.” But as 2023 looms, NATO-compatible tanks—even less heavily-armed defensive-oriented ones—are still stuck on the proverbial table.
(..)
Under normal circumstances, Germany and the United States would be falling all over themselves to “capture” Ukraine’s long-term tank business. But front-line battle tanks are tricky things. For better or worse, tank suppliers get tied to their clients, associated with every future conflict they get into. Both Germany and the United States might support Ukraine today, but neither Germany nor the United States seem particularly eager to see their front-line tanks become the public “face” of the Ukrainian army, highlighted whenever Ukraine and Russia face off in the future.
(..)
Redefine Older NATO Armor As Defensive
Complicating matters, Ukraine’s transformation to a NATO arsenal has been waylaid by timorous bureaucrats that preemptively defined tanks as “offensive” weaponry and deemed “escalatory” by Russia’s erratic leadership.
The concerns are misplaced. Modernized T-72s are already flowing into Ukraine with little response from Russia, so drawing the line at modern tanks seems an absurd exercise in unilateral demilitarization. But if it helps, NATO should tinker with their overly-broad parameters, adopting a simple definition for “defensive armored vehicles.”
Leopard I
A defensive armored vehicle could simply be older, lighter Western vehicles that maintain, say, a 105mm main gun (rather than the larger caliber main guns on modern main battle tanks). That points Ukraine firmly towards Leopard I tanks, M-60 Patton Main Battle tanks, early-model Abrams tanks and even the U.S. Army’s unwieldy up-gunned, eight-wheeled Strykers.
M1128 Mobile Gun System
(..)
M-60 Patton Main Battle
Defensive tanks make sense. A NATO-standard tank armed with an 105mm gun is not going to go toe-to-toe with Russia’s dwindling supply of top-tier tanks. The older NATO tanks can be a boon on the Ukrainian battlefield, but they’re not capable of carrying out a full-fledged assault on the gates of Moscow.
Offline
