Pārsvarā jā, vairums 400V sistēmā esošie ir ar 100-150kW max ātrumu, kas pie 80% parasti jau ir ~50% no max. Tiesa, 800V sistēmā esošie ir ar lielākiem akumulatoriem un smagāki auto per se, tāpēc arī patēriņš lielāks. Mazajiem/vidējās klases EV nevajag tos kosmiskos uzlādes ātrumus, lai arī būtu patīkami ātri uzlādēties. Tos vajag tiem, kam ziemā 35kWh/100Km patēriņš
10 Dec 2023, 01:32:31 @XK220 rakstīja:
Pārsvarā jā, vairums 400V sistēmā esošie ir ar 100-150kW max ātrumu, kas pie 80% parasti jau ir ~50% no max. Tiesa, 800V sistēmā esošie ir ar lielākiem akumulatoriem un smagāki auto per se, tāpēc arī patēriņš lielāks. Mazajiem/vidējās klases EV nevajag tos kosmiskos uzlādes ātrumus, lai arī būtu patīkami ātri uzlādēties. Tos vajag tiem, kam ziemā 35kWh/100Km patēriņš
Teslai ir 70 kWh bača, 400 V.
Normāls svars un patēriņš
Un lādējas diezgan ciešami
Kaadas aplikaacijas ir vajadziigas Latvijaa EV uzlaades stacijaam (nu taa, lai aptvertu visu)? Negribu piebraukt un tad chakareeties ar lejupielaadi un kartes pievienoshanu.
Neguļ neguļ
Saļepī vienu sūdu, sasola ka nu tik būs, apgūst valsts naudu un izčab.
Šim pašam-"nākošgad uzbūvēs vēl piecus un gada beigās būs sērijveida ražošana" cauruļu rāmis jau ir overkill sērijveida ražošanai bet presformu virsbūvju štancēšanai viņi nepavilks.
Christian Christensen @ChrChristensen
1) A little Christmas story from Sweden about free speech and self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" Musk's Tesla and X/Twitter. Striking Tesla worker Janis in Sweden gets a phone call from boss asking how he's doing. Boss then brings up Janis' wife.
2) Janis' boss says it came to their attention that Janis' wife had made critical comments about Tesla on her X/Twitter account, which is a violation of his contract with Tesla. Janis was confused, as it was his wife who posted, not him. And, she surely had free speech rights?
3) Turns out Janis' wife had made critical comments on X/Twitter about Tesla's overtime policy. According to Tesla, that was a violation of "Article 11" covering secrecy, and that as she had the same last name her comments were covered by the secrecy clause in his contract.
4) A meeting was arranged between Janis, Tesla and a legal rep for Janis' union. When union lawyer asked for a clarification of what an employee could or could not say about Tesla, Tesla's own rep couldn't give an answer. Then came Musk's favorite topic: free speech.
5) Union lawyer asked Tesla rep if agreement wasn't actually written for the US market. Tesla admitted it was. Union lawyer then noted in Sweden free speech laws meant employees could not be subject to strict secrecy rules of that kind. Tesla admitted free speech should apply.
6) Labor law in Sweden says employees cannot publicly harm employers through, for example, revealing corporate secrets or lying about the company. But discussing or even criticizing working conditions doesn't fall under that category so long as facts presented are true.
7) The story raises many flags. Most obviously, it goes against Musk's whole routine about free speech and free expression. This was a spouse writing about overtime rules. And, one wonders if Tesla or X/Twitter actively monitor X/Twitter accounts of Tesla employees AND spouses.
Of course, free speech lover Musk has a long history of attempting to keep employees, Tesla owners and journalists quiet. This included trying to make employees who were fired sign agreements with "non-disparagement" clauses that had no end date.
9) Tesla was asked to comment on the story from Sweden about attempting to restrict what the wife of an employee can write on X/Twitter. So far, they have not responded.
10) This thread generated a lot of responses from people telling me the Tesla employee signed a contract so should shut up. Then, right on cue, news comes in that a court found Musk violated the contacts of Twitter staff by not paying promised bonuses.
Christian Christensen @ChrChristensen
1) A little Christmas story from Sweden about free speech and self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" Musk's Tesla and X/Twitter. Striking Tesla worker Janis in Sweden gets a phone call from boss asking how he's doing. Boss then brings up Janis' wife.
2) Janis' boss says it came to their attention that Janis' wife had made critical comments about Tesla on her X/Twitter account, which is a violation of his contract with Tesla. Janis was confused, as it was his wife who posted, not him. And, she surely had free speech rights?
3) Turns out Janis' wife had made critical comments on X/Twitter about Tesla's overtime policy. According to Tesla, that was a violation of "Article 11" covering secrecy, and that as she had the same last name her comments were covered by the secrecy clause in his contract.
4) A meeting was arranged between Janis, Tesla and a legal rep for Janis' union. When union lawyer asked for a clarification of what an employee could or could not say about Tesla, Tesla's own rep couldn't give an answer. Then came Musk's favorite topic: free speech.
5) Union lawyer asked Tesla rep if agreement wasn't actually written for the US market. Tesla admitted it was. Union lawyer then noted in Sweden free speech laws meant employees could not be subject to strict secrecy rules of that kind. Tesla admitted free speech should apply.
6) Labor law in Sweden says employees cannot publicly harm employers through, for example, revealing corporate secrets or lying about the company. But discussing or even criticizing working conditions doesn't fall under that category so long as facts presented are true.
7) The story raises many flags. Most obviously, it goes against Musk's whole routine about free speech and free expression. This was a spouse writing about overtime rules. And, one wonders if Tesla or X/Twitter actively monitor X/Twitter accounts of Tesla employees AND spouses.
Of course, free speech lover Musk has a long history of attempting to keep employees, Tesla owners and journalists quiet. This included trying to make employees who were fired sign agreements with "non-disparagement" clauses that had no end date.
9) Tesla was asked to comment on the story from Sweden about attempting to restrict what the wife of an employee can write on X/Twitter. So far, they have not responded.
10) This thread generated a lot of responses from people telling me the Tesla employee signed a contract so should shut up. Then, right on cue, news comes in that a court found Musk violated the contacts of Twitter staff by not paying promised bonuses.
Maz sakara ar šo topiku...
Izcelts tikai tapēc, ka sviedriem musks nepatīk defoltā...
Izcelts tikai tapēc, ka sviedriem musks nepatīk defoltā...
tesla ražo ko citu kā elektroauto?
un tas parāda ne īsti foršo klimatu uzņēmumā un visā kas ar to saistīts. kopā ar ne īsti labo attieksmi pret uzticamību un garantiju samērā būtisks - teslai
Offline
cauruļu rāmis jau ir overkill sērijveida ražošanai bet presformu virsbūvju štancēšanai viņi nepavilks.
Online
Of course, free speech lover Musk has a long history of attempting to keep employees, Tesla owners and journalists quiet. This included trying to make employees who were fired sign agreements with "non-disparagement" clauses that had no end date.