Ulrike Franke @RikeFranke
That's... odd?
British transport aircraft ferrying anti-armour weaponry to Ukraine is actively (?) avoiding German air space. Wonder what the reason is.
viņš principā labi kustās, tikai nevajag tukšgaitā darbināt ilgi, tad aizmet sveces, kas arī nav nekas traks, uz prīmusa sveces var fiksi izdedzināt un atkal ir dzirkstele un viss pārējais
18 Jan 2022, 19:31:13 @kaprons rakstīja:
vēl no kā jāuzmanās, ir tanks Armata
viņš principā labi kustās, tikai nevajag tukšgaitā darbināt ilgi, tad aizmet sveces, kas arī nav nekas traks, uz prīmusa sveces var fiksi izdedzināt un atkal ir dzirkstele un viss pārējais
viss tiks noglušīts, kibernētika sajuks prātā, bet šis tiks līdz Berlīnei
Šajā vates agregātā dēļ skaņas temperatūras vibrācijas un radiotraucējumu fona mūsdienu Samsungs glāsteklis un planšete konkrēti pateiktu autofkaveridž un uz garantiju cerēt būtu naivi
18 Jan 2022, 21:19:34 @abyss rakstīja:
Vēlos tikai atgādināt, ka pret Lafter labāk būt laipnam. Nevar zināt, kad pašiem tuvākā vai tālākā nākotnē var nākties meklēt patvērumu citās zemēs
Man jau šķiet miskastnieki ir kārtējo reizi apdirsušies tagad tikai ir vienīgais jautājums, ar cik sūdainu seju viņi izies no pašu radītas situācijas
man jau šķiet ar asti kājstarpē un nekā vispār nebija kautkā tā, vseh pereigrali
lohi pilnīgi, bet dabas resursi viņus uztur...
How ambitious are Russia’s foreign policy objectives, and how much force does Moscow believe it must employ to achieve them? Moscow has submitted various ultimatums, but the most critical and pressing issue is that the Kremlin now regards Ukraine as a permanently hostile country continuing to increase its defense capabilities. Russian hopes for improved relations with President Volodymyr Zelensky were dashed in 2021, and Moscow is now focused on reducing the long-term security risk posed by Ukraine, including halting its expanding defense cooperation with NATO. However, this is one of the most unrealistic and difficult demands for NATO to satisfy, particularly because Ukraine is developing long-range missiles domestically. This diplomatic impasse suggests a significant risk of a Russian military escalation in Ukraine with few obvious offramps.
A number of recent articles have suggested that the costs of a potential invasion are too high, or that the purpose of a Russian military operation in Ukraine would be to occupy territory. A better explanation of Moscow’s current actions is that they are part of a compellence campaign. If Moscow cannot convince the United States to agree to some of its demands and force Ukraine to make concessions, it may view military force as its last resort to change what it considers an unacceptable status quo. Russian behavior suggests that it believes the costs of inaction would be greater than the costs of a significant military escalation in Ukraine, particularly after reviewing the events in Ukraine over the summer and fall. Moscow’s military objectives would focus on imposing unacceptable costs on Ukraine by destroying military units, inflicting casualties, taking prisoners of war, or degrading Ukraine’s ability to defend itself. Russia could choose to seize territory to raise the costs on Kyiv, but this would likely not be the ultimate objective. Moscow could possibly achieve its objectives by unleashing Russia’s superior fires capability without an invasion or launching a short punitive raid with a planned withdrawal. These options would have fewer risks and costs than a large-scale invasion designed to occupy significantly more territory.
Kaut kur lasīju, ka naudas viņiem dahera, 6-7 gadi nieks.
Ne visai tautai, bet pietiekoši elitei.
Vērojot, kas tur notiek rodas sajūta, ka tajā teritorijā ir vairākas krievijas un vienu problēmas neuztrauc citus. Nevis teritoriāli, bet mentāli. Un katrs dzīvo netraucējot citus.
Dīvaini, ka armijnieki neliek selfijus no Ukrainas robežas, bet gan jau visi telefoni atņemti.
[ Šo ziņu laboja Fandulis, 19 Jan 2022, 00:18:45 ]
Offline
