29 Nov 2020, 23:42:10 @bmwaddict rakstīja:
interesanti cik tos macpro Apple vispaar ir paardevushi
diez vai vispaar jebkad atsitiis R&D izmaksas par to speeljlietinju. bet vinji var atljauties jo liberaalie fanboji gatavi sapirkt telefonus pa $1400 gabalaa
Riktīgs offtopic, bet redzu, ka arī šeit tev ir stingrs viedoklis viena lieta, ka mac pro nav viņu bread&butter, lielāko daļu naudas viņi pelna citur. Otrs - tev tàds toolis nav nepieciešams ikdienas darbiem, līdz ar to liekas overpriced shit. Trešais, kas attiecināms uz citiem apple overpriced shit produktiem (piemēram, ripuļiem šim datoram), apple tàdus produktus ir izlaidis visu laiku, un tas liek viņu pārējam stafam izskatīties kā great value
nu tad pis nahuj ar oftopiku
jaa es zinu ka tas nav vinju bread&butter paldies seedies 5 pridurok
taapeec jau vinji var atljauties tirgot ritentinjus jo miljoniem taadi kaa tu samaksaas par to peerkot suuda trubas pa $1400
lietas notika citaadaak kameer Steve Jobs vadiija uznjeemumu.
ja gribi kko piebilst (un es zinu tu gribi ) raksti pareizajaa topikaa
[ Šo ziņu laboja bmwaddict, 30 Nov 2020, 09:26:56 ]
30 Nov 2020, 09:48:47 @koderis rakstīja:
operatoru subsidēts aifons noteikti ir pareizais piemērs, aģik pilnā cena bija $499, kas tiem laikiem bija kosmoss titāna vertu maksāja 1k, kas skaitījās jebaķ kas par blatiem un pontiem
Trampistiem tas taa normaali
"The iPhone was released in the United States on June 29, 2007 at the price of $499 for the 4 GB model and $599 for the 8 GB model"
30 Nov 2020, 09:48:47 @koderis rakstīja:
operatoru subsidēts aifons noteikti ir pareizais piemērs, aģik pilnā cena bija $499, kas tiem laikiem bija kosmoss titāna vertu maksāja 1k, kas skaitījās jebaķ kas par blatiem un pontiem
Trampistiem tas taa normaali
"The iPhone was released in the United States on June 29, 2007 at the price of $499 for the 4 GB model and $599 for the 8 GB model"
drosi vien fake news
Protams fake news, augstāk bija bilde ar patiesību.
Šis topiks viss ir offtopiks, jo visi vienkārši smej par adiktu, kā viņš ar putām uz lūpām aizstāv oraŅžo dievu
Un vispaar VPEZDU juus visus sifona eksperti posteejat tak attieciigajaa tofikaa. atnaaca pedars DeCe iesmirdeeja kko bezsakariigu no fakebooka un tagad visiem lielais cepiens addikts nepiekriit nenostaajas rindaa un nepieliecaas..
ejiet tak dirst miiliishi jums tuvaa sifontu teemaa es sheit vairs nepiedalos
[ Šo ziņu laboja bmwaddict, 30 Nov 2020, 11:07:45 ]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07:28 @bmwaddict rakstīja:
Un vispaar VPEZDU juus visus sifona eksperti posteejat tak attieciigajaa tofikaa. atnaaca pedars DeCe iesmirdeeja kko bezsakariigu no fakebooka un tagad visiem lielais cepiens addikts nepiekriit nenostaajas rindaa un nepieliecaas..
ejiet tak dirst miiliishi jums tuvaa sifontu teemaa es sheit vairs nepiedalos
Ziņas par Trampa uzvaru meklē ar tādu pašu rūpību, kā padsmit gadus veca iphone cenu?
30 Nov 2020, 11:07:28 @bmwaddict rakstīja:
Un vispaar VPEZDU juus visus sifona eksperti posteejat tak attieciigajaa tofikaa. atnaaca pedars DeCe iesmirdeeja kko bezsakariigu no fakebooka un tagad visiem lielais cepiens addikts nepiekriit nenostaajas rindaa un nepieliecaas..
ejiet tak dirst miiliishi jums tuvaa sifontu teemaa es sheit vairs nepiedalos
Ziņas par Trampa uzvaru meklē ar tādu pašu rūpību, kā padsmit gadus veca iphone cenu?
Ifona cenai vismaz kaut kādā mērā bija sakarība ar patiesību
Scott Pelley: And with a paper record, you can go back and verify what the machine is saying by physically counting the paper?
Chris Krebs: That gives you the ability to prove that there was no malicious algorithm or hacked software that adjusted the tally of the vote, and just look at what happened in Georgia. Georgia has machines that tabulate the vote. They then held a hand recount and the outcome was consistent with the machine vote.
Scott Pelley: And that tells you what?
Chris Krebs: That tells you that there was no manipulation of the vote on the machine count side. And so that pretty thoroughly, in my opinion, debunks some of these sensational claims out there-- that I've called nonsense and a hoax, that there is some hacking of these election vendors and their software and their systems across the country. It's-- it's just-- it's nonsense.
Chris Krebs: Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote.
Scott Pelley: In a news conference a lawyer who was representing the president at the time, Sidney Powell, said specifically that the Dominion Company's voting machines, quote…
Sidney Powell on November 19: It can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden.
Chris Krebs: Votes were cast in Georgia, for instance, again, on paper. They were counted by a machine. They were subsequently recounted by hand. The outcomes of that count were consistent. If there was an algorithm that was flipping votes or changing votes, it didn't work. I think the more likely explanation, though, is that there is no algorithm, that the systems performed as intended. That the series of security controls before, during, and after an election protected those systems from any sort of misbehavior.
30 Nov 2020, 19:01:14 @DeeCee rakstīja:
nedaudz no Chris Krebs par vēlēšanu sistēmas drošību
..kaada huijna tiek nesta ar ahuuni gudru sejas izteiksmi...
chali tu bremzee vai kaa?
jaa tagad laikam ir taa kursh uztaisiis gudraaku rozhu un paarliecinoshaak runaas tam taisniiba?
tak par to ir staasts! paper traila nav deelj mail in ballots! tikko iznjem biljetenu no aploksnes taa pazuud saikne starp veeleetaja identitaati un vinja balsi. un aploksnes protams veikli tika iemestas shrederii!
par to ir staasts kaapeec ir nepiecieshamas shaadas balsis PEEC veeleeshanaam - lai piemestu klaat tik cik vajadziigs peec manipulaacijaam ar balsoshanas mashiinu
kaapeec Trampa veeleetaaji kas balsoja caur pastu aiziet un paarbauda onlainaa - vinju balsis nav ieskaitiitas bet vinju sunji kas nemaz nepieprasiija pasta balsoshanu nezkaapeec ir balsojushi pa pastu un vinju balsis ir ieskaitiitas?
tak tur jau taa saals! recount vairs nevienu nepis jo tas tak jau buus piereguleets taa lai +/- sakriit lai peec tam var pateikt - oh nu mums bija neliela kljuudinja bet tas nemaina rezultaatu!
ja nepaarbauda kas balso, ja nesaliidzina parakstus, ja var balsot no cita shtata, ja var balsot mirushie utt tad uzrodaas balsu batchi vairaaku tuukstoshu apmeeraa visi chista par Baidenu
Nevadaa tuukstoshiem mistisku balsu ar adresi kautkaadaa casino..
Tas pats ar in-person balsiim - peec tam kad mashiinas ir saskaitiijushas taa kaa vajag tad atliek tikai piemest klaat pareizi iekjekseetus fake ballots un lieta dariita.
Blja tas ir pzdec kas daraas bet mudlo DeCe tak atradiis vienu vidosu kur viens ar pilniigi nopietnu sejas izteiksi nes huinju ka recounts visu atrisina
[ Šo ziņu laboja bmwaddict, 30 Nov 2020, 22:42:03 ]