Info ka Piedņestra pieparsot neatkarību, iespējams krievs ies glābt, batjkam jau bij kartē sarkana bulta uz turieni.
Rumānija ja ies glābt Moldovu tad Nato in
04 Mar 2022, 21:41:54 @JohnyB rakstīja:
Info ka Piedņestra pieparsot neatkarību, iespējams krievs ies glābt, batjkam jau bij kartē sarkana bulta uz turieni.
Rumānija ja ies glābt Moldovu tad Nato in
Taa nav !! Nato ir "in" kad viss NATO pienem leemumu nevis viena valsts izdomaa uzbrukt.
Even as governments and corporations around the globe squeeze the Russian economy through increasingly stringent financial sanctions for the country's invasion of its neighbor, Ukraine, some within the aggrieved nation have sought to punish Russia further, by kicking it off the internet entirely.
On Monday, a pair of Ukrainian officials petitioned ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) as well as the Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC), to revoke the domains ".ru", ".рф" and ".su." They also asked that root servers in Moscow and St. Petersburg be shut down — potentially knocking websites unde those domains offline. On Thursday, ICANN responded to the request with a hard pass citing that doing so is not within the scope of ICANN's mission and that it's not really feasible to do in the first place.
"As you know, the Internet is a decentralized system. No one actor has the ability to control it or shut it down," ICANN CEO Göran Marby, wrote in his response to ICANN representative for Ukraine, Andrii Nabok, and deputy prime minister and digital transformation minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, on Thursday.
"Our mission does not extend to taking punitive actions, issuing sanctions, or restricting access against segments of the Internet — regardless of the provocations," he continued. "Essentially, ICANN has been built to ensure that the Internet works, not for its coordination role to be used to stop it from working."
Major crypto exchanges including Coinbase and Binance are refusing a request by Ukraine to freeze all Russian accounts, saying that doing so would harm civilians and be counter to their ideals. "To unilaterally decide to ban people’s access to their crypto would fly in the face of the reason why crypto exists,” a Binance spokesperson told CNBC.
In a tweet, Ukraine's Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Federov asked major crypto exchanges to freeze all Russian and Belarus accounts, not just the accounts of sanctioned oligarchs. "It's crucial to freeze not only the addresses linked to Russian and Belarusian politicians, but also to sabotage ordinary users," he said.
Such a move would be in line with US and European Union sanctions against Russian banks and leadership designed to cripple the nation's economy. However, freezing crypto holdings could directly impact regular Russian citizens.
Coinbase said it's already sanctioning any persons or entities in Russia as required by law, but won't go any further. "A unilateral and total ban would punish ordinary Russian citizens who are enduring historic currency destabilization as a result of their government’s aggression against a democratic neighbor," it told Motherboard. Binance similarly stated that it wouldn't "unilaterally freeze millions of innocent users’ accounts."
Binance, on the flip side, said it has committed to donate at least $10 million in humanitarian aide to Ukraine and launched a fundraiser with the goal of raising $20 million. The company is also currently under investigation by the US government for alleged money laundering and insider trading.
Other exchanges including KuCoin also said they wouldn't go beyond anything required by law. Kraken exchange CEO Jesse Powell said that such a move would violate the company's "libertarian values."
One exception is Dmarket, a Ukraine-based platform that allows people to trade NFTs and virtual in-game items. The company said in a tweet that it had cut "all relationships with Russia and Belarus due to the invasion of Ukraine."
04 Mar 2022, 21:41:54 @JohnyB rakstīja:
Info ka Piedņestra pieparsot neatkarību, iespējams krievs ies glābt, batjkam jau bij kartē sarkana bulta uz turieni.
Rumānija ja ies glābt Moldovu tad Nato in
ja bet tapat ja tie ukrainji nedirsh par kilotajiem tie 10 k pret iesutitajiem 200 k ir nekas, vinji ja ugalju var sadzit vel 100 k vesi. taka par zaudejumiem tur ir poher pilnigs. sak bishku apnikt. ari tie zvani mammai nu naher tas vajadzigs ?!! radiet beigtos orkus, nenjemt vinjus gusta kaut kada hernja. nededziniet tas pushkas nu pareizi chalji teica daunji aidedzina tanku a tur ieksha ladinji , norauj torni tankam tornis trapa elektro stabam visam ciemam pazud elektriba - ahujeno vertigs gajiens !!!
[ Šo ziņu laboja SpOrcMeN, 04 Mar 2022, 23:24:12 ]
----------------- ІБАШТЕ!!!!! ЗА УКРАЇНУ!!!!!!!
Нехай подохне суче плем’я!!!!
Cik reāls scenārijs, ka NATO aiziet "mūsu tur nav" režīmā un pa kluso samazina RUS iznīcinātāju skaitu? Ir reāli, vai tomēr viss radaros tāpat redzams abām pusēm un UA gaisa telpā ieiet nepamanītam nav iespējams?
Pēc tā, kāda panika pēdējās dienās Zeļenskim, izskatās, ka ilgi vairs neizvilks.
Man kā dīvāna speciālistam liekas ,ka gaisa kauja starp iznīcinātajiem UKR gadijumā diez vai būtu efektīva un jēdzīga un NATO lidmašīnu ielidošana Ukrainā būtu pārāk pamanāma .
Tās pašas pretgaisa aizsardzības raķetes ir daudz vieglāk pārvietojamas un piegādājamas un vieglāk izlikties ,ka ''mūsu tur nav''. Cits jautājums jau šobrīd ir par loģistiku -vai un cik daudz un cik ātri citas valstis ir gatavas šobrīd tās raķetes piegādāt.
Offline
tapēc, ka ligistics disruptions pagaidām slēdz un vates darbinieki sēdēs uz pabalstiem. 
