Viss ir kruta. Būs 98, 120 lašu vietā. Es citādi visu dienu domāju, kā nu būs, ka sanāks, ka es ar savu mazjaudīgo dotēšu stīla emku, jo tad abiem būtu vienādi.
24 Nov 2010, 15:21:46 Staris rakstīja:
Nu sekojiet taču līdzi infai
es 150to reizi saku. Es sazinājos ar MK un man atbildēja, ka ir runa par 1. reģistrāciju Latvijā nevis auto izlaiduma gadu.
Arī tikko ievests 1990gada golfs no Lietuvas var tikt pakļauts jaunajam nodoklim.
23 Nov 2010, 23:14:31 Staris rakstīja:
automašīnām ar pirmo reģistrāciju (nevis LV, bet vispār) zem 2005. gada skatīsies tikai masu. Beidziet spekulēt.
Sesks ibio
viens posts ir vakardien rakstīts, otrs šodien.
Vakar vēl nebija informācijas no MK
Psc FM āksti
Un daudz loģiskāk, ja nodevas lielumu noteiktu Satiksmes nevis FM, bet tā kā tam nodoklim vairs nav nekāda sakara ar ceļiem, bet budžetu, tad tam neloģiskumam ir arī loģisks izskaidrojums
24 Nov 2010, 18:52:32 AV rakstīja:
Mana gadijuma nodoklis peksni pieaug 4,5 reizes (no Ls 75 uz Ls 332) un apskate jau februari. Isti godigi neskjiet.
+1
Lai gan pats nebraucu ar jaunu, daudzlitrīgu apvidus auto, liekās tomēr diezgan liels stulbums.
Un, protams, naivi būtu cerēt, ka pēc ziemas ceļi būs labāki kā bija šopavasar (pēc pirmā nodokļu palielinājuma).
24 Nov 2010, 18:52:32 AV rakstīja:
Mana gadijuma nodoklis peksni pieaug 4,5 reizes (no Ls 75 uz Ls 332) un apskate jau februari. Isti godigi neskjiet.
nu tev luksus vagens
ko nozime luksus vagens?
The concept of luxury has been present in various forms since the beginning of civilization. Its role was just as important in ancient western and eastern empires as it is in modern societies.[1] With the clear differences between social classes in earlier civilizations, the consumption of luxury was limited to the elite classes. It also meant the definition of luxury was fairly clear. Whatever the poor cannot have and the elite can was identified as luxury. With increasing ‘democratization’,[2] several new product categories were created within the luxury market which were aptly called – accessible luxury or mass luxury. This kind of luxury specifically targeted the middle class (or what is sometimes termed as aspiring class). As luxury penetrated into the masses, defining luxury has become difficult.[3]
In contemporary marketing usage, Prof. Bernard Dubois defines ‘luxury’ as a specific (i.e. higher-priced) tier of offer in almost any product or service category. However, despite the substantial body of knowledge accumulated during the past decades, researchers still haven’t arrived on a common definition of luxury. Many other attempts have been made to define luxury using the price-quality dimension stating higher priced products in any category is luxury. Similarly, researchers have used the uniqueness aspects of luxury too. Prof. Jean-Noel Kapferer, takes an experiential approach and defines luxury as items which provide extra pleasure by flattering all senses at once. Several other researchers, focus on exclusivity dimension and argue that luxury evokes a sense of belonging to a certain elite group. http://wikicars.org/en/Luxury_car
[ Šo ziņu laboja karlsonss, 24 Nov 2010, 19:05:41 ]
24 Nov 2010, 19:02:50 Srakans rakstīja:
Kā jau redzi, smags ar lielu motoru un jaudīgs
un kapec man butu jamaksa lielaka ikgadeja auto nodeva?
kapec, to neattiecina, piemeram, uz loti maziem auto? (pienemot, ka ar tadiem parsvara parvietojas 1 cilveks, kurs ir slinks/neekologisks un negrib braukt ar sabtransu)
Offline
par to, ka opelim ir lielāks nodoklis nekā manam pietiekami jaudīgajam BMW 
tb žetons Lacītim?
