blee, skatos, ka otrdien vairs nebūs uz kurieni braukt, točna laikam būs jāskrien jau ātrāk, pēdējo reizi pa jauno tiltu nobraukt, pie Brīvības pieminekļa ziedus nolikt, utt...
----------------- Piedāvāju jaunas auto daļas, eļļas, riepas, piekares daļas utt...
Neesmu gan spečuks, bet man domāt tai tantei ir caurums 5.klases ģeogrāfijas zināšanās.
Latvijas tuvumā tak nav nekādas tektonisko plātņu saskares vietas, bet cik atceros, zemestrīces rodas tādās vietās, kur viena plātne rīvējās gar otru.. palabojiet ja kļūdos, ar ģeogrāfiju esmu uz "jūs"
loģiski, ka murgi. Tagad visi plānprātiņi var skriet uz RIMI izpirkt ēdienu krājumus
Ja jau viss pārbīdījās, tad kāpēc nekas vēl tagad nenotiek? Tik tiešām nedēļu atpūšas zeme un tad sāk tikai mesties pēc asu nobīdes? Fizikā atvaļinājumi nav. Ja nobīdās ass, tad davai sākas viss uzreiz momentā nevis pēc nedēļas vai 4 gadiem
12 Mar 2011, 12:08:58 Ch rakstīja:
tagad nav laika meklēt, bet kkad rīta pusē cnn vai bbc bija raksts par kkādām izmaiņām pie japošiem. Pārskrēju pāri, nebija laika izlasīt sīkāk.
pati sala par 2.5m paarvietojusies, taa zinaataaji saka cnn
ja man buutu pieeja kaadam daudz maz zinaamam portaalam, shaadaa izdeviigaa situaacijaa es arii noteikti iekakaatu kaadu rakstu par kaadu gaizinja izvirdumu vai baltezera cunami kurs radies no burzhuju kluchu sastreeguma kanalizaacijaa, tas ir labs veids kaa vismaz vienreiz likt par sevi dzirdeet
12 Mar 2011, 12:16:16 Belluuns rakstīja:
ja man buutu pieeja kaadam daudz maz zinaamam portaalam, shaadaa izdeviigaa situaacijaa es arii noteikti iekakaatu kaadu rakstu par kaadu gaizinja izvirdumu vai baltezera cunami kurs radies no burzhuju kluchu sastreeguma kanalizaacijaa, tas ir labs veids kaa vismaz vienreiz likt par sevi dzirdeet
12 Mar 2011, 12:17:23 Ugunsdzesejs rakstīja:
drīzāk krasta līnija ir novirzījusies pateicoties korkujumam ārējo mantiju slāņos, kas radās noviržu laikā. par visu salu neticu
Italy's National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology said the earth's axis shifted 25 cm as a result of the quake and the U.S. Geological Survey said the main island of Japan had shifted 2.4 meters.
Nu Itāļi jau ir īstie kam ticēt. Sēž un skatās uz savu Etnas vulkānu visu laiku un domā ko tādu gudru papļūtit. Kā tad viņi pa divām dienām to visu izmērīja?
Japanese chief cabinet secretary confirms radiation leakage occured from explosion at #Fukushima nuclear power plant - Reuters
1016: The BBC's environment correspondent Roger Harrabin says he understands the blast at the nuclear plant may have been caused by a hydrogen explosion - also one of the possibilities laid out by Walt Patterson of Chatham House. "If nuclear fuel rods overheat and then come into contact with water, this produces a large amount of highly-flammable hydrogen gas which can then ignite," our correspondent says.
Ja jau Čīles zemestrīce varēja,tad kapēc šitā domajat nevarēja?
The Feb. 27 magnitude 8.8 earthquake in Chile may have shortened the length of each Earth day.
JPL research scientist Richard Gross computed how Earth's rotation should have changed as a result of the Feb. 27 quake. Using a complex model, he and fellow scientists came up with a preliminary calculation that the quake should have shortened the length of an Earth day by about 1.26 microseconds (a microsecond is one millionth of a second).
Perhaps more impressive is how much the quake shifted Earth's axis. Gross calculates the quake should have moved Earth's figure axis (the axis about which Earth's mass is balanced) by 2.7 milliarcseconds (about 8 centimeters, or 3 inches). Earth’s figure axis is not the same as its north-south axis; they are offset by about 10 meters (about 33 feet).
By comparison, Gross said the same model estimated the 2004 magnitude 9.1 Sumatran earthquake should have shortened the length of day by 6.8 microseconds and shifted Earth's axis by 2.32 milliarcseconds (about 7 centimeters, or 2.76 inches).
Gross said that even though the Chilean earthquake is much smaller than the Sumatran quake, it is predicted to have changed the position of the figure axis by a bit more for two reasons. First, unlike the 2004 Sumatran earthquake, which was located near the equator, the 2010 Chilean earthquake was located in Earth's mid-latitudes, which makes it more effective in shifting Earth's figure axis. Second, the fault responsible for the 2010 Chiliean earthquake dips into Earth at a slightly steeper angle than does the fault responsible for the 2004 Sumatran earthquake. This makes the Chile fault more effective in moving Earth's mass vertically and hence more effective in shifting Earth's figure axis.
Gross said the Chile predictions will likely change as data on the quake are further refined.
----------------- "The quieter you become the more you can hear."