"Krievu pētnieciskās žurnālistikas tīmekļa izdevumā "The Insider" publicētā informācija par Latvijas uzņēmumu iesaisti Krievijas militāro rūpnīcu apgādē ar mikroshēmām ir nepatiesa un apmelojoša, "Delfi Bizness" uzsver rakstā minētās Latvijas kompānijas."
""Līgumi ar Krieviju tika pārtraukti ar kara sākšanos, kā arī pirms tam uzņēmuma mikroshēmas netika ražotas un piegādātas militārām vajadzībām," viņš saka.
Uzņēmumam gan ir klienti arī Ķīnā, bet tas neietekmē "RD Alfa mikroelektronikas departamenta" pārliecību, ka tā saražotā produkcija nenonāk Krievijā. "Mēs ar visiem sadarbības uzņēmumiem parakstām līgumu, ka gala lietotājs nebūs Krievijā vai citās sankcijām pakļautās valstīs, un produkcija tur nenonāks," skaidro Lapkis.
Viņš arī uzsver, ka uzņēmuma darbība notiek, pilnībā ievērojot Latvijas un Eiropas Savienības eksporta-importa kontroles procedūras prasības."
21 Sep 2023, 12:00:56 @user rakstīja:
tas Polijas Ukrianas strīds, protams, interesants.. Un jocīgi Ukaina, ka pārmet Polija sava tirgus aizsardzību.
"Moraveckim trešdien tika uzdots jautājums, vai Polija turpinās atbalstīt Kijivu, neraugoties uz šo strīdu.
"Mēs vairs nepiegādājam ieročus Ukrainai, jo tagad mēs apbruņojam Poliju ar mūsdienīgākiem ieročiem," atbildēja Moraveckis."
Tas ir tad, kas gribās uz krāna palēkāt un zivtiņu paēst. Tad, tā notiek. Nevajag kļūt bezkaunīgam.
----------------- Gribās pļūtīt? Nejūties novērtēts? Neviens nepievērš uzmanību?
Spied zemāk. Spama topiks
Jā! Man jūk komati. Tas dēļ ilga perioda komunicējot citās valodās.
21 Sep 2023, 12:00:56 @user rakstīja:
tas Polijas Ukrianas strīds, protams, interesants.. Un jocīgi Ukaina, ka pārmet Polija sava tirgus aizsardzību.
"Moraveckim trešdien tika uzdots jautājums, vai Polija turpinās atbalstīt Kijivu, neraugoties uz šo strīdu.
"Mēs vairs nepiegādājam ieročus Ukrainai, jo tagad mēs apbruņojam Poliju ar mūsdienīgākiem ieročiem," atbildēja Moraveckis."
I see that the manipulation of the statement @MorawieckiM
begins, and yet both fragments can be directly quoted:
"We will certainly not risk Ukraine's security, which is why our hub in Rzeszów, in consultation with the Americans and NATO, continues to play the same role as it did. And it will continue to do so."
Nothing more needs to be added here. Supplies of materials for the defense of Ukraine have been, are and will continue.
However, the second fragment manipulated in the message:
"We are no longer transferring any weapons to Ukraine because we are now arming ourselves
with the most modern weapons. If you don't want to defend yourself, you must have SOMETHING to defend yourself - this is our principle. And that's why we have made increased orders (...) - we focus on quickly arming the Polish army."
Of course, the statement is taken out of context and manipulated, but this is the truth: while other large NATO countries give equipment from arms depots after disbanded units, Poland is the only country with numerous land forces that donated equipment taken from the lines. Taken from Polish soldiers from line units. The Germans are giving museum equipment - Leopard 1A5s, which even the Ukrainians did not want to accept. We are giving Leopard 2s that we are taking from the line in 10BKPanc, we are giving a battalion of Wolverines that we are taking from 17WBZ, we have given and are still giving "Twarde" PT-91s taken from the lines in Braniewo and Giżycko.
More than 270 T72M1/M1Rs donated to Ukraine were tanks freshly renovated from frontline units of the Polish Armed Forces.
In 2019, Poland nominally had 861 tanks. We donated approximately 350 of these to Ukraine.
40%! No one has given more than us in relation to the armed forces. Artillery?
By spring 2022, the Polish Armed Forces received approximately 82 Krab AHS. 54.65% went to Ukraine! I ignore deliveries from this year. There are many such examples. No one gave as much as Poland and as quickly as Poland. We simply don't have anything to give anymore. Because we have already taken it from a Polish soldier to give it to a Ukrainian one. We temporarily weakened the Polish Armed Forces, but thanks to the fact that equipment from Poland saved Ukraine, our security per se increased - by stopping Russian imperialism on the battlefield and by bleeding the Russian Armed Forces. In return, we buy new equipment, but these purchases - due to the need - are not optimal - we buy them on different terms because we have no choice. And the equipment is just arriving. We will close the gap for approximately 30-40% of the Land Forces by at least 2027-2028.
I really hope that the ill-considered statements of the Ukrainian side and the row over grain are the result of the position of the oligarchs and the quality of the political class in Ukraine, and not a cynical conclusion that we have already given everything we could give...
Please forward the entry. It won't make up for the damage that an ill-considered and out-of-context tweet from the Prime Minister's statement will make up for, but maybe it will explain it a little better.
19 Sep 2023, 22:02:19 @user rakstīja:
tipa katru nakti gandrīz Ukraiņi nomauc kādus 20-30 krievu dronus.. a nahujam krievi nemauc, piemēram, tos 200 dronus jeb nedēļas normu vienā naktī? tad klusums un atkal vienā naktī visu baru? tādos kara apstākļos tie 20-30 droni taču neko nespēj ietekmēt
Es protams varu kļūdīties, bet lai palaistu 10 reizes vairāk dronus, vajag 10 reizes vairāk palaišanas iekārtu (tos palaiž no iekārtām, ja pareizi saprotu), tāpat vajag 10 reizes vairāk cilvēkus, kas spēj tiem ievadīt/ieprogrammēt mērķi, maršrutu un citus parametrus, jo cik noprotu tie nav tiešsaistē vadāmi, un papildus tam , protams, vajag arī 10 reizes vairāk ierīces, ar ko šo parametru iestatīšanu veikt, jo, atkal minēšu, to nevar paveikt ar skrūvgriezi un āmuru. Krieviem viss ir vienkārši ar stulbiem kartupeļiem priekš vienkāršiem uzdevumiem, sarežģītākas ierīces, ko paši neražo un ar tām rīkoties apmācītu cilvēku trūkums tur ir liels (atkal minējums), jo tur (krievijas armijā) dēļ korupcijas un zagšanas speciālistu apmācība nekad nav bijusi prioritāte.
Sieru kara stratēģijas pamatā bija un ir terors, tādēļ šāda dozēšana ilgtermiņā ir ar mērķi salauzt civilos + nospotot pretgaisa aizsardzības lokācijas, kad tās reaģē uz tām miskastēm. Dīvānpirdēja personīgais viedoklis.
ChrisO_wiki @ChrisO_wiki
·
18m
At least two hits directly into the building, and the BROACH warheads will have absolutely wrecked the interior and anyone in it at the time. They won't be using that building again for a long time to come.
nav apstiprināts, bet baumo
Some sources claim that Admiral Viktor Sokolov, the Commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet was killed in today's Ukrainian attack on the HQ in temporarily occupied Sevastopol, Crimea
Offline
. 
